AI Reputation Agent

Ask for feedback while the patient experience is still fresh

A planned agent for collecting patient feedback, routing concerns to the practice, and supporting approved review requests after care.

Coming soon

The intended workflow

This page describes the roadmap, not a generally available product. The workflow the practice would approve looks like this.

  1. 01

    Define the eligible visit

    The practice would decide which completed visits enter the workflow and when the patient hears from the office.

  2. 02

    Ask for feedback

    The approved message and channel, with a clear next step and no pressure on the patient.

  3. 03

    Route concerns to a person

    A low score, complaint, or callback request would become a staff task with the available context.

  4. 04

    Track the outcome

    The team would see who responded, which concerns need action, and which approved review requests were sent.

What the planned agent is intended to handle

Feedback is most useful when the practice can act on it — the design goal is response, not rating.

  • Approved feedback requests

    Sent after eligible visits, on the practice's schedule.

  • A structured satisfaction signal

    A recorded patient response, not a guess about sentiment.

  • Concerns to staff first

    Complaints and callback requests routed to the practice, not the public.

  • Policy-gated review requests

    A public review request only where the practice's policy allows it.

  • Follow-up status

    The state of each post-visit conversation, visible to the team.

  • Opt-outs respected

    Patients who decline are recorded and excluded from the workflow.

Protect the relationship before chasing a rating

The planned agent is not a tool for filtering out criticism or manufacturing positive reviews. Patients choose whether and what to post — the agent would support an approved request and track the workflow.

The exact workflow and availability will be confirmed before launch.

  • No review gating

    Criticism is routed to staff to act on — never suppressed to protect a score.

  • Staff hear concerns first

    A concern would become a staff task before any review request goes out.

  • The practice's policy governs

    Review policy, patient consent, and platform rules stay the practice's responsibility.

  • Patients decide

    No posting on a patient's behalf, and an opt-out stops the workflow.

What a practice should be able to measure

The intended records, once the agent ships:

  • Visits in the workflow

    Eligible visits added after care.

  • Requests delivered

    Feedback requests delivered and answered.

  • Concerns raised

    Concerns sent to staff for follow-up.

  • Staff response status

    Where each concern stands.

  • Review requests sent

    Approved public review requests, and no others.

  • Opt-outs

    Patients who asked not to be contacted.

Intended reporting for a planned capability — recorded workflow outcomes, not promised ratings or review volumes.

FAQ

Frequently Asked Questions

It is planned. Contact us if post-visit feedback and review follow-up are a priority for your practice.